| There's no ROI on deploying IPv6 |
We'll deploy IPv6 next financial year |
Larger headers are less efficient |
We'll deploy IPv6 right after we deploy DNSSEC |
It's not mature enough |
| We don't need that many addresses |
It's too hard to support |
It's too complicated |
IPv6 isn't supported by OVH Cloud |
We have IPv6, but we just want to keep things simple |
| Android doesn't support DHCPv6 |
Our Lawful Intercept doesn't support IPv6 yet |
 |
IPv6 just isn't a priority |
I don't want to lose the security provided by NAT |
| AWS doesn't support it |
No one else has deployed it |
Our recursive DNS can't handle the extra load |
Too many people have broken IPv6 stacks |
Github doesn't support IPv6 |
| None of our customers want it |
NAT444 is fine |
We don't have a lab to test it |
Azure doesn't support it |
Our Dynamic DNS doesn't support it |
Made with excuses from